Came to me in the wee hours of the morning. I actually remembered it this time. And I got the idea from the Zed administration:
As part of the Cap and Trade movement, the feds should not allow
anyone involved in this business proposition to make more than $250,000 a year. That's $250,000 a year total, even if they have other businesses or income. If they're involved in the government mandated, and therefore government supported / subsidized, Cap and Trade system, their pay is capped at a more-than-fair quarter mil a year.
If it's good enough for TARPed bank executives it should be good enough for anyone who seeks to profit unduly from Global Warming. We might even consider a lower number because this trading is doing Zed's work. Also, if we lower the number, more savvy businessmen and women will be able to get in on the action, thus spreading the wealth and not allowing anyone to get stinking rich off Cap and Trade. (Side idea: A new cartoon character who can help sell - or should I say brainwash - the children of our brave new world on the idea of Manmade Global Warming: Cap'n Traid.)
It goes without saying that the first man
out under my scheme will be Albert Gore. The idea of doing good without the opportunity to corner the carbon market and get absolutely, stinking, stupid rich is repugnant to most jet-setting Warmers and this may be enough to derail the whole GW scam.
To build on this brilliant idea and to further the cause of fairness, anyone - ANYONE - pulling a paycheck of any kind from the federal government, including (especially)our elected officials, should have their total income capped at $250,000, which would extend a minimum of five years after they leave "public service."
We might consider an escape clause to this cap. They can make as much as they want after leaving elective office (this would include being voted out) if they serve only one term as a senator or two terms as a representative. Call it
de facto term limits.